Award Methodology

Best Lawyers® in America

Best Lawyers is one of the most established and respected peer-review guides in the legal profession. Attorneys are selected based entirely on confidential feedback from other lawyers practicing in the same geographic and legal areas. This recognition is widely regarded as a mark of legal excellence and professional integrity.
View methodology

Super Lawyers® and Rising Stars

Super Lawyers uses a multiphase selection process that includes peer nominations, third-party research, and independent evaluation across 12 key indicators of professional achievement. Only the top 5% of attorneys are named to the Super Lawyers list, while the Rising Stars distinction is limited to attorneys under 40 or practicing fewer than 10 years, representing no more than 2.5% of attorneys in each state.
View selection process

National Law Journal & Recorder Legal Awards

Our firm and attorneys have been honored in awards programs hosted by The National Law Journal and The Recorder, recognizing leadership, litigation excellence, and industry impact. Selection is based on nominations, public records, and editorial judgment, with categories such as Elite Trial Lawyers, Top Verdicts, and Litigation Departments of the Year.
View NLJ methodology
View California Legal Awards categories

Martindale-Hubbell AV Preeminent® Rating

The AV Preeminent® rating is the highest rating awarded by Martindale-Hubbell®, reflecting the confidential opinions of lawyers and judges regarding a lawyer’s legal ability and ethical standards. This peer-review rating is considered a significant mark of distinction, indicating that the attorney has been recognized for the highest level of professional excellence.
View rating guidelines

The National Trial Lawyers: Top 100

The National Trial Lawyers Top 100 is an invitation-only professional organization composed of the most qualified civil plaintiff and criminal defense trial lawyers from each state. Selection is based on a combination of peer nominations and third-party research evaluating reputation, influence, leadership, and success in trial advocacy. Membership is extended exclusively to those who meet objective and uniformly applied standards.
View selection criteria

Important Disclaimer Regarding Awards and Past Results

These awards are based on proprietary methodologies and criteria established by each independent organization. They are intended to provide background on our attorneys’ professional recognition and credentials and do not reflect or predict outcomes in any individual legal matter.

Past results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Every case is different and must be evaluated based on its unique facts and legal context.

No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey.